﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title>Bottled Llama Brewing Blog</title>
	<updated>2008-07-25T00:54:49Z</updated>
	<id>http://blog.bottledllama.com/atom.aspx</id>
	<link rel="self" href="http://blog.bottledllama.com/atom.aspx" />
	<link rel="alternate" href="http://blog.bottledllama.com" />
	<generator uri="http://app.onlinequickblog.com/" version="2.0">Quick Blog</generator>
	<entry>
		<title>Old Tasting Notes:  Flying Dog - Tire Bite</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://blog.bottledllama.com/2008/07/21/old-tasting-notes--flying-dog--tire-bite.aspx" />
		<id>tag:blog.bottledllama.com,2008-07-21:5eb61083-82e0-4970-ba94-d423fd1cb6e1</id>
		<author>
			<name>Roger the Beerist</name>
		</author>
		<category term="Golden Ale" />
		<category term="Old Tasting Notes" />
		<category term="Beer review" />
		<updated>2008-07-21T10:03:37Z</updated>
		<published>2008-07-21T09:11:00Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<P dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"><FONT face=Georgia size=3><A href="/bcCreateEntry.aspx#"></A><FONT size=+0><A>Flying Dog's Tire Bite</A></FONT></A><IMG src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/100653-93340/Old_Tasting_Notes.jpg" width=480 border=0><BR><BR><BR>It is time for another beer from the Notes.&nbsp; For any who don't know about this series of blog entries, here's the scoop:&nbsp; I stumbled upon an old file that contained tasting notes from approximately two and a half years ago, possibly even older than that (definitely older than that - more like four or five years old).&nbsp; I decided to&nbsp;post these very sparse notes&nbsp;and I hope to eventually find these same beers again and evaluate them once more, just to see what differences are manifest.&nbsp; <BR><BR>This&nbsp;seventh beer of the Old Tasting Notes series is:&nbsp;<FONT size=+0><A href="http://www.flyingdogales.com/default.asp" target=_blank></A><FONT size=+0>Flying Dog's Tire Bite</FONT></A></FONT>, a Golden Ale.<BR><BR>&nbsp; <IMG src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/100653-93340/tire_bite.gif" width=85 border=0><BR></FONT><FONT face=Georgia size=3><BR>The guys at Flying Dog are self-proclaimed 'non-conformists.'&nbsp; Apparently, Mr. Stranahan and Mr. McIntyre were completely stoned as they sat high up in the Himalayas and saw a flying dog.&nbsp; Likely, it was a Tibetan monk who'd just gotten into a bar fight and had been thrown out quite violently.&nbsp; This monk flew over the prone figures of the future Flying Dog brewers.&nbsp; <BR><BR>They desire to be purposeful, provocative and irreverent.&nbsp; After reading stuff on their website and listening to interviews, I'm convinced that they just like thinking they are better than everyone.&nbsp; Whatever.&nbsp; Everyone seems to really appreciate them in the craft beer world.&nbsp; <BR><BR>I shouldn't mind them, really.&nbsp; They sound like me and Royal.&nbsp; Only we didn't see an impossible animal, we simply wrote stories about one:&nbsp; <A href="http://bimmeronstone.wordpress.com/" target=_blank>the bottled llama</A>.&nbsp; We, too, think we are better than everyone; well, Royal does.&nbsp; Or not.&nbsp; I don't really know.&nbsp; The big difference between us and the Flying Dog dudes is:&nbsp; they have a brewery and we don't.&nbsp; Ah, now I understand the source of by resentment.<BR><BR>Thus and so, on to the notes.&nbsp; The scorecards used contained five categories:&nbsp; Color, Collar, Boquet, Mouthfeel, Taste, Overall.&nbsp; At the bottom of the card there is a space to score the beer from 1 to 5.&nbsp; They're very generic scoresheets and notes.<BR><BR></FONT></P>
<BLOCKQUOTE>COLOR -&nbsp;Gold - slight haze<BR><BR>COLLAR - Thick, small bubbles<BR><BR>BOQUET -&nbsp;Slight hops<BR><BR>MOUTHFEEL - Very light<BR><BR>TASTE - Light - even body<BR><BR>OVERALL - Nothing spectacular<BR><BR>SCORE (1-5) - 4<BR><BR>COMMENTS - Better than Bud - could drink for a while<BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<P dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"><BR><FONT face=Georgia size=3><BR>So, let's mock my notes.&nbsp; "Better than Bud."&nbsp; Well, DUH!!!!!&nbsp; That could apply to tap water.&nbsp; Apparently, this beer didn't jump out and ... bite me.&nbsp; It sounds like a good example of a golden ale.&nbsp; <BR><BR>The next Old Taste will be a picaroon.&nbsp; Figure that out.&nbsp; Until then, have an old pint.&nbsp; Er, no, just have a pint.&nbsp; </FONT></P>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Old Tasting Notes:  Shipyards Specialty</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://blog.bottledllama.com/2008/06/17/old-tasting-notes--shipyards-specialty.aspx" />
		<id>tag:blog.bottledllama.com,2008-06-17:3f162734-b859-4ad7-9511-a1e44e129af8</id>
		<author>
			<name>Roger the Beerist</name>
		</author>
		<category term="Specialty Beer" />
		<category term="Old Tasting Notes" />
		<category term="Beer review" />
		<updated>2008-06-17T13:41:15Z</updated>
		<published>2008-06-17T13:23:00Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<P dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"><FONT face=Georgia size=3><IMG src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/100653-93340/Old_Tasting_Notes.jpg" width=480 border=0><BR><BR><BR>It is time for another beer from the Notes.&nbsp; For any who don't know about this series of blog entries, here's the scoop:&nbsp; I stumbled upon an old file that contained tasting notes from approximately two and a half years ago, possibly even older than that (definitely older than that - more like four or five years old).&nbsp; I decided to&nbsp;post these very sparse notes&nbsp;and I hope to eventually find these same beers again and evaluate them once more, just to see what differences are manifest.&nbsp; <BR><BR>This&nbsp;fourth beer of the Old Tasting Notes series is:&nbsp; <A href="http://www.shipyard.com/">Shipyard</A> Specialty.&nbsp; I think it's this beer: <IMG style="WIDTH: 278px; HEIGHT: 183px" height=292 src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/100653-93340/shipyard.jpg" width=700 border=0>.&nbsp;&nbsp;But I'm not positive.<BR><BR></FONT><FONT face=Georgia size=3>I was just so lax with my stupid notes!&nbsp; I noted that this beer was "spicy," that's why I'm leaning towards the Winter Ale.&nbsp; <BR><BR>Thus and so, on to the notes.&nbsp; The scorecards used contained five categories:&nbsp; Color, Collar, Boquet, Mouthfeel, Taste, Overall.&nbsp; At the bottom of the card there is a space to score the beer from 1 to 5.&nbsp; They're very generic scoresheets and notes.<BR><BR></FONT></P>
<BLOCKQUOTE>COLOR -&nbsp;Ruby red<BR><BR>COLLAR - Thick, small bubbles - ivory<BR><BR>BOQUET -&nbsp;Strong hops, definite ale<BR><BR>MOUTHFEEL - Thick<BR><BR>TASTE - Bit of a bite, slightly spicy<BR><BR>OVERALL - Decent, too sweet<BR><BR>SCORE (1-5) - 3<BR><BR>COMMENTS - Not as spicy as some specialties, nothing impressive</BLOCKQUOTE>
<P dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"><FONT face=Georgia size=3><BR>"Strong hops, definite ale."&nbsp; What's that?&nbsp; A stupid statement, that's what.&nbsp; Well, I have nothing more to say.&nbsp; Peruse these notes and go buy some Shipyard beers.<BR><BR>The next Old Taste will be a Tire Bite.&nbsp; Figure that out.&nbsp; Until then, have an old pint.&nbsp; Er, no, just have a pint.&nbsp; </FONT></P>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>First Voyage of The Vessel - Podcasting About IPAs</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://blog.bottledllama.com/2008/06/14/first-voyage-of-the-vessel--podcasting-about-ipas.aspx" />
		<id>tag:blog.bottledllama.com,2008-06-14:3bde75f9-36db-45bd-a88b-dd7ced4471cf</id>
		<author>
			<name>Roger the Beerist</name>
		</author>
		<category term="Podcast" />
		<updated>2008-06-14T13:08:06Z</updated>
		<published>2008-06-14T12:48:12Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[The podcast is complete.&nbsp; Here it is for your enjoyment.<br><br><br>Here's a summary of the show for any who do not wish to listen.&nbsp; First, the premise is that we, the owners of Bottled Llama, are trapped inside a fermentation vessel (we nicknamed the vessel Tank) and we are forced to drink beers and decide which one is best.<br><br>Our first voyage was an IPA battle.&nbsp; The four that Tank gave us were:&nbsp; <br><a href="http://www.bridgeportbrew.com/ourales/featured/ipa.php"><br></a><ol><li><a href="http://www.bridgeportbrew.com/ourales/featured/ipa.php">BridgePort India Pale Ale</a></li><li><a href="http://www.boulderbeer.com/">Mojo</a></li><li><a href="http://www.dogfish.com/brewings/Year_Round_Beers/90_Minute_IPA/11/index.htm">DogFish Head 90 Minute IPA</a></li><li><a href="http://www.stonebrew.com/ruin/">Ruination IPA</a></li></ol><br>We drank, we chatted, we declared a winner.&nbsp; Bridgeport was an utter bust, both of us were un-impressed with it's boring nature.&nbsp; Mojo was a surprise - I'd only had it once before and this was the first time for Royal.&nbsp; It had outstanding clarity and great balance.&nbsp; The 90 Minute IPA was a thick interpretation.&nbsp; But, what else is to be expected from Dogfish Head, right?&nbsp; It was chewy and caramelly and the hops settled at the bottom.&nbsp; Stone's Ruination was, as expected, a hoppy delight.<br><br>The winner was Mojo.&nbsp; It went down like this:<br><br><ol><li>Mojo</li><li>Ruination</li><li>90 Minute</li></ol><br>Sorry, BridgePort got no points at all and so doesn't even get on the list.&nbsp; Lots of other stuff was discussed, too; like InBev's attempt to take over Budweiser; other bloggers and the Session were mentioned - you can find links to these blogs on the sidebar there.&nbsp; Visit, read, enjoy.&nbsp; If you want to email us at all, here' s three ways:<br><br>tank@bottledllama.com<br>royal@bottledllama.com<br>roger@bottledllama.com<br><br><br><br>]]></content>
		<link type="audio/mpeg" title=".mp3" href="http://media.podcastingmanager.com/100653-93340/Media/The%20Vessel%20Voyage%20I%20-%20IPA.mp3" length="43645902" />
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>The Weekly Pint:  A Scotch Ale from Sam Adams</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://blog.bottledllama.com/2008/03/06/the-weekly-pint--a-scotch-ale-from-sam-adams.aspx" />
		<id>tag:blog.bottledllama.com,2008-06-13:632f40ac-d5a5-4d22-a2fe-c0586ed57ef9</id>
		<author>
			<name>Roger the Beerist</name>
		</author>
		<category term="Beer review" />
		<category term="Scotch Ale" />
		<updated>2008-06-13T10:53:51Z</updated>
		<published>2008-06-13T10:50:00Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<P><IMG style="WIDTH: 367px; HEIGHT: 232px" height=301 src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/100653-93340/TWP.jpg" width=700 border=0><BR><BR><BR><FONT face=Georgia><FONT size=3>This week's pint is Scotch Ale from <A href="http://www.samueladams.com/samsite/verification.aspx">Samuel Adams</A>.<BR><BR><BR>Is it made from scotch?&nbsp; No.&nbsp; Does it have Scotch tape in it?&nbsp; Thankfully, no.&nbsp; However, it can be strong and sticky.&nbsp; It's called Scotch ale because it's from Scotchland - I mean, Scotland.&nbsp; Certainly that makes sense.&nbsp; We refer to the inhabitants thereof as Scotchy's.&nbsp; <BR><BR>No, no that's wrong, sorry.&nbsp; They're Scots.&nbsp; Well, the dogs from o'er there are Scotchy's.<BR><BR>No, no that's wrong, too, sorry.&nbsp; They're called Scotties, sometimes.&nbsp; Oh, well, Captain Kirk always hollered through his communicator, "Scotchy, beam me up."<BR><BR>All right, that's totally wrong, too.&nbsp;&nbsp;Well, there are some references to the&nbsp;Scottish also being called&nbsp;the Scotch.&nbsp; So, anyway, now that that's out of the way ...&nbsp;&nbsp;<BR><BR>Here's some interesting information regarding Scotch Ale.&nbsp; According to the <A href="http://www.beertown.org/">Brewer's Association</A> Style Guidelines:<BR><FONT face=Times-Roman size=2><BR></FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<BLOCKQUOTE>"there is little evidence suggesting that traditionally made strong Scotch ales exhibited peat smoke character"<BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<P><FONT face=Georgia><FONT size=3><BR>Then, <EM><A href="http://www.allaboutbeer.com/style/24.5-scotchale.html"><EM>All About Beer</EM></A> </EM>states:&nbsp; <BR><BR></FONT></FONT></P>
<BLOCKQUOTE>"Historical Scottish beers were very "peaty" in many cases."<BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<P><FONT face=Georgia><FONT size=3><BR>Hmmm.&nbsp; Which should be believed?&nbsp; Well, I consulted the blog <A href="http://barclayperkins.blogspot.com/2008/02/scotch-ale-iv.html">Shutup About Barclay Perkins</A>.&nbsp; I like reading it now and again because of two reasons.&nbsp; 1) Mr. Pattinson seems to be a cynical, sarcastic jerk and I love it; he does not hold back anything.&nbsp; 2) He researches old brewing books or something; anyway, the info he has is reputedly from old sources and since the brewer's of antiquity had no Internet we can certainly believe whatever they say.&nbsp; Here's a comment from that blog on Scotch ale:<BR><BR></FONT></FONT></P>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
<P>" ...from "An Encyclopædia of Domestic Economy" by Thomas Webster, William Parkes, 1855, page 598.<BR><BR>"Scotch Ale- The Scotch, particularly the Edinburgh ales of the present day, made partly on the old plan, are esteemed equal, if not superior, to any in Britain; and certainly some of the best Scotch ales have a flavour extremely vinous, and approaching the nearest of any of our ales to some of the light French wines. They are particularly mild in their flavour and pale in colour, and the taste of the hop does not predominate."<BR></P></BLOCKQUOTE>
<P><FONT face=Georgia><FONT size=3><EM><FONT face=Verdana>&nbsp;</EM></FONT><BR>Ah, fabulous.&nbsp; No mention of peat in that encyclopedia.&nbsp; From the little bit that I read, I'd say that the original Scotch ales were pale in color and not peaty.&nbsp; As they migrated to Britain, the peat started appearing.&nbsp; Either way, they are palatable beers.&nbsp; <BR><BR>Let's talk about Sam Adams' version.&nbsp; It was&nbsp;dark brown, more so than I anticipated, with shafts of ruby rays skewering the body.&nbsp; It had a brownish collar that sticks to&nbsp;the glass.<BR><BR>I expected it to be syrupy, like McEwan's.&nbsp;&nbsp;Not so, though.&nbsp; Sam Adams version had a maltier side to it.&nbsp; I think the wispy smokiness contrasted the sweetness, too.&nbsp; According to the label, the special peat-smoked malt utilized in the brewing process gives it the darkness and the smokiness.<BR><BR>Well, cool, I loved it.&nbsp; And garlic sauce really makes the peat smoke stand out.&nbsp; A lot.&nbsp; No, really, I mean it's like drinking liquid smoke.&nbsp; Cool.<BR></FONT><BR><FONT size=3>Until the next pint ...</FONT>&nbsp; <FONT size=3>take a few moments and check out some of the other pints.&nbsp; That's right, just look over the sidebar there and find a beer style you like.&nbsp; Read away.</FONT></FONT></P>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Good News to Proclaim Regarding the BLB Podcast</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://blog.bottledllama.com/2008/06/11/good-news-to-proclaim-regarding-the-blb-podcast.aspx" />
		<id>tag:blog.bottledllama.com,2008-06-11:3ee0e923-5519-4b09-a4ac-5f9d0ca77d17</id>
		<author>
			<name>Roger the Beerist</name>
		</author>
		<category term="Podcast" />
		<updated>2008-06-12T10:04:31Z</updated>
		<published>2008-06-11T21:24:00Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<FONT face=Georgia><FONT size=3>Although it has been silent for a time, the official podcast of Bottled Llama Brewing is poised to make a comeback.&nbsp; Likely, I should not be telling you this but I think you deserve to know the inside secrets.&nbsp; Just don't tell Royal.&nbsp; If he catches me doing this, well, I'm done for. <BR><BR>I will tell you this much, ere I'm found out.&nbsp; First, the new episode will be with a totally redesigned format.&nbsp; We'll still be battling beers but it will be much more lucid and fluid.&nbsp; We will re-start with a battle of India Pale Ales.&nbsp; Additionally, the new name of the podcast is ...<BR><BR><SPAN style="FONT-STYLE: italic">The Vessel</SPAN>.<BR><BR><BR>I'll let you imagine what it will be like.&nbsp; The show should get recorded this Friday.&nbsp; <BR><BR></FONT><BR><BR></FONT>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Conversion Process:  My First Taste of Cheap Beer and What It Really Meant</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://blog.bottledllama.com/2008/02/19/conversion-process--the-first-taste-of-the-greater-journey.aspx" />
		<id>tag:blog.bottledllama.com,2008-06-04:fef1b529-a879-4005-9e9a-d09cfa19a645</id>
		<author>
			<name>Roger the Beerist</name>
		</author>
		<category term="Gray Hunter" />
		<category term="life" />
		<category term="Don't Rightly Know/Not Sure" />
		<updated>2008-06-04T15:05:50Z</updated>
		<published>2008-06-04T15:00:00Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<FONT face=Georgia size=3>After searching for my first memory of tasting beer, I decided it must have been when I was about twelve, maybe thirteen.&nbsp; (No one panic, this is not advocating underage drinking).&nbsp; I was with my dad at the house of a family friend.&nbsp; I vaguely remember being outside on a porch.&nbsp; There was a big Igloo-like picnic cooler nearby.&nbsp; It was full of ... wait for it ... Old Milwaukee.<BR><BR>Our&nbsp;family had moved to the Four Corners region of New Mexico circa 1981.&nbsp; My dad had a janitorial business and followed&nbsp;the work to&nbsp;a little town called Aztec.&nbsp; It was about twenty minutes away from Farmington, which was the 'big' town.&nbsp; It had a mall, you know;&nbsp;that's also where all the cleaning jobs were.&nbsp; I was in&nbsp;second grade.&nbsp; It was also a place full of cowboys - and their hats and their boots and their cheap beer.&nbsp; I'm glad I was not contaminated by their proclivities.<BR><BR>But many people were so contaminated and we even befriended them.&nbsp;&nbsp;One was the family friend mentioned at the outset.&nbsp; He had a double-wide mobile home situated on a good sized tract of land and,&nbsp;of course,&nbsp;horses.&nbsp; Even so, he was a good man.&nbsp; He ended up helping me out when I was in my teenage years, just a little, as best he could.&nbsp; My dad and I parted ways in those years.&nbsp; I guess I won't complain much about Joe's bucolic character.&nbsp; <BR><BR>Old Milwaukee was the beer he drank.&nbsp; My dad is not really fond of beer.&nbsp; He just drank it that day to be polite.&nbsp; Or maybe because he just doesn't know how to say no.&nbsp; He's not the most socially savvy person, eh.&nbsp; Anyway, that day on the porch he ended up with an open can and he and Joe thought I might want to try it.&nbsp; So I did.&nbsp; <BR><BR>Now this was some twenty-five years ago; I do not remember exactly what I thought the beer tasted like (I only know what I think of it now).&nbsp; I do remember that I didn't like it much.&nbsp; I think I must have made an odd face when I took a sip because I vaguely remember them laughing - you know, that adult laugh when a kid does something cute.&nbsp; That same laugh I use on my kids now, that innocuous chuckle that says, 'I wish you'd stay a kid longer; soon you'll be grown up and we'll be sharing a beer and talking about adult life and that's just not right.'&nbsp; That's a lot to say in a little laugh.<BR><BR>I don't remember what we were talking about or what time of year it was or the time of day or anything.&nbsp; I just know that I didn't really like that fuzzy beer stuff, but it was cool to be allowed to drink it and hang out with the men.&nbsp; </FONT>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>The Weekly Pint:  A Pub Ale from England - Boddington's</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://blog.bottledllama.com/2008/03/06/the-weekly-pint--a-pub-ale-from-england--boddingtons.aspx" />
		<id>tag:blog.bottledllama.com,2008-05-16:4c5744a9-1cd4-49ea-8ca0-7ea54fd2c513</id>
		<author>
			<name>Roger the Beerist</name>
		</author>
		<category term="Beer review" />
		<category term="Pale Ale" />
		<category term="Weekly Pint" />
		<updated>2008-05-16T10:54:42Z</updated>
		<published>2008-05-16T10:45:00Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<IMG style="WIDTH: 597px; HEIGHT: 389px" height=502 src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/100653-93340/TWP.jpg" width=700 border=0><BR><BR><FONT face=Georgia size=3>My, that picture's huge, isn't it?&nbsp; Ah, well ... this week's pint is Boddington's Pub Ale.&nbsp; Does the fact that the picture is extra big have anything to do with the beer?&nbsp; No, now shutup and read.<BR><BR>It's an English beer, canned in bright yellow sixteen ounce cans with a nifty nitrogen widget to make it draught-like.&nbsp;&nbsp; It's packaged in fours, certainly because 'five is right out!'&nbsp; (That's a Monty Python reference for any who don't know.&nbsp; If you didn't know that, well, 'you make me sad').&nbsp; It's an interesting beer and I'm not sure why I like it.&nbsp; It doesn't taste like ... anything.<BR><BR>It does smell like stale beer scattered across an old bar, like entrails upon a battlefield.&nbsp; Oh, not very appealing, eh?&nbsp; I think it lends a unique&nbsp;aromatic ambience to the drinking experience.&nbsp; I couldn't really distinguish any&nbsp;hops bouquet.&nbsp; <BR><BR>It's a very creamy beer, smooth as silk.&nbsp; It's a little sweet, but not much else comes through.&nbsp; When I first drank it, I thought, "Well, that's absolutely boring.&nbsp; Stupid beer, I'll not buy you again."&nbsp; However, I did buy it again.&nbsp; And again.&nbsp; And yet again.&nbsp; I cannot rightly explain my obsession with it.&nbsp;&nbsp;<BR><BR>Perhaps it's the appearance.&nbsp;&nbsp;It's a beautiful, bright yellow (like the cans) and the head is perfect, a half finger&nbsp;layer of snow&nbsp;on a pond of alcoholic delight.&nbsp; Perhaps it&nbsp;is the blandness itself.&nbsp; There is no analysis that needs to take place.&nbsp; No guessing what malts were used (gotta be pale), no tracking down the hops, no divining what yeast or spices&nbsp;are in play.&nbsp; Just pour it into a dimpled&nbsp;English mug, sit back and enjoy.<BR><BR>Super, now I want some.&nbsp;&nbsp;<BR><BR>Until the next pint ...&nbsp;</FONT>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>The Weekly Pint:  Bon Secours Blonde</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://blog.bottledllama.com/2008/04/23/the-weekly-pint--bon-secours-blonde.aspx" />
		<id>tag:blog.bottledllama.com,2008-05-09:0ec22e6e-1ed6-4db8-8fdc-e96e63b39e10</id>
		<author>
			<name>Roger the Beerist</name>
		</author>
		<category term="Great Assortment" />
		<category term="Beer review" />
		<category term="Blond" />
		<category term="Weekly Pint" />
		<updated>2008-05-10T11:47:58Z</updated>
		<published>2008-05-09T00:00:00Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<img style="width: 391px; height: 243px;" src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/100653-93340/TWP.jpg" border="0" height="271" width="700"><br><br><font face="Georgia" size="3">Ah, blonds.&nbsp; What is it that makes them so appealing?&nbsp; The body?&nbsp; The effervescence?&nbsp;&nbsp;The deceptive aura of innocence?&nbsp; Yes, all those things.&nbsp; This time 'round I had a French version of a Belgian blond.&nbsp; It was from Brasserie Caulier and it's called Bon Secours.&nbsp; <br><br>I'm not really sure what Bon Secours means.&nbsp; "Healing" is apparently part of the meaning.&nbsp; The beer is also labeled 'bier vivante' which I believe means "this beer is alive ... IT'S ALIVE!" (to be shouted in your best Gene-Wilder-as-Dr-Frankenstein voice).&nbsp; So, this "live beer" (or bottle conditioned, as we say in the industry) will "heal" you from whatever ailments you may have.&nbsp; Please note, I'm not French at all, so I'm not positive about the above meanings.&nbsp; I'm fairly certain, of course, but not positive.&nbsp; After all, I'm not French.&nbsp; These meanings were lifted from various online dictionaries.&nbsp; I tried contacting the brewery itself, but they've not written back to me - probably because I'm, you know, not French.<br><br>However, I do know that the beer was bottle conditioned for I got bits of sediment in my beer.&nbsp; It poured a deep yellow; in fact, it was slightly brown - a well tanned blond.&nbsp; <img src="http://blog.bottledllama.com/emoticons/smile.png" border="0"> .&nbsp; It had a pure white head.&nbsp; It smelled like paint thinner.&nbsp; Or perhaps a better analogy would be nail polish, since we are talking about blonds.&nbsp; There was a very slight hops aroma, a European variety.&nbsp; To be fair, I was brewing the same day I took this blond, so the Sterling hops I was using to brew my Belgian strong ale were wafting through the air.&nbsp; <br><br>Fortunately, I did not taste any hops.&nbsp; I think the nail polish aroma and taste overpowered any hops that might be present.&nbsp; It tasted sweet and spicy like a peppered liqueur.&nbsp; The body was viscous and effervescent.&nbsp; Despite the effervescece, the carbonation felt subdued.&nbsp; There was no aftertaste.&nbsp; The 8% abv sneaks up on you.&nbsp; It was absolutely wonderful.<br><br>The Belgians have superb beer styles and this French brewed version was really a lot of fun - just like a blond should be.<br><br>Until the next pint ...</font>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Old Tasting Notes:  Downtown Brown</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://blog.bottledllama.com/2008/05/08/old-tasting-notes--downtown-brown.aspx" />
		<id>tag:blog.bottledllama.com,2008-05-08:188720dd-9fc8-455f-b409-ccd9814f79af</id>
		<author>
			<name>Roger the Beerist</name>
		</author>
		<category term="Brown" />
		<category term="Old Tasting Notes" />
		<category term="Beer review" />
		<updated>2008-05-13T08:25:52Z</updated>
		<published>2008-05-08T08:21:00Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<P dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"><FONT face=Georgia size=3><IMG src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/100653-93340/Old_Tasting_Notes.jpg" width=480 border=0><BR><BR><BR>It is time for another beer from the Notes.&nbsp; For any who don't know about this series of blog entries, here's the scoop:&nbsp; I stumbled upon an old file that contained tasting notes from approximately two and a half years ago, possibly even older than that (definitely older than that - more like four or five years old).&nbsp; I decided to&nbsp;post these very sparse notes&nbsp;and I hope to eventually find these same beers again and evaluate them once more, just to see what differences are manifest.&nbsp; <BR><BR>This third beer of the Old Tasting Notes series is:&nbsp; Downtown Brown, a brown ale from ...&nbsp; well, I'm not totally sure(nor could I capture a good pic!).&nbsp; Here's the deal:&nbsp; I wrote in my notes "Downtown Brown - Acme."&nbsp; So, I looked up those terms and came up with <A href="http://www.northcoastbrewing.com/home.htm">North Coast Brewing</A>, who carries the Acme beers (though not the brown anymore?); and <A href="http://www.lostcoast.com/index.html">Lost Coast Brewing</A>, who has a beer called Downtown Brown, though Acme is not associated with it.&nbsp; </FONT><FONT face=Georgia size=3><BR><BR>The Lost Coast label looks very familiar, but that could be deceptive.&nbsp; I like their Great White beer, since that's my favorite shark.&nbsp; So, I may not be remebering the label from the day of the tasting.&nbsp; I just don't know.&nbsp; I may be getting the label mixed up with Beertown Brown, too.&nbsp; The "Acme" thing just threw me right off.&nbsp; <BR><BR>Thus and so, on to the notes.&nbsp; The scorecards used contained five categories:&nbsp; Color, Collar, Boquet, Mouthfeel, Taste, Overall.&nbsp; At the bottom of the card there is a space to score the beer from 1 to 5.&nbsp; They're very generic scoresheets and notes.<BR><BR></FONT></P>
<BLOCKQUOTE>COLOR -&nbsp;Orange/Brown<BR><BR>COLLAR - Spectacular - thick &amp; foamy<BR><BR>BOQUET -&nbsp;Malty<BR><BR>MOUTHFEEL - Light - smooth<BR><BR>TASTE - Cologne/perfume - missing the nut of brown<BR><BR>OVERALL - Color is off - almost a brown hint, but not quite<BR><BR>SCORE (1-5) - 2<BR><BR>COMMENTS - Should be a red, then would be to style</BLOCKQUOTE>
<P dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"><FONT face=Georgia size=3><BR>The notes are kind of boring.&nbsp; It almost sounds like I got a bad bottle, foamy and solventy.&nbsp; <BR><BR>Whatever.&nbsp; The next Old Taste will be a "specialty ale".&nbsp; I don't know what that means.&nbsp; I think it's a winter beer.&nbsp; Until then, have an old pint.&nbsp; Er, no, just have a pint.&nbsp; </FONT></P>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Homebrewing Update:  Clawed the First Now in Bottles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://blog.bottledllama.com/2008/05/07/homebrewing-update--clawed-the-first-now-in-bottles.aspx" />
		<id>tag:blog.bottledllama.com,2008-05-08:36a531fb-ccca-4393-83b3-348eb1fde308</id>
		<author>
			<name>Roger the Beerist</name>
		</author>
		<category term="Belgian Ale" />
		<category term="Homebrewing" />
		<updated>2008-05-08T06:12:57Z</updated>
		<published>2008-05-08T06:15:00Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<FONT size=3><FONT face=Georgia>At last, the Belgian ale is in the bottle.&nbsp; Fifty of them, to be precise.&nbsp; <BR><BR>It happened Tuesday.&nbsp; I had the day off (part of a very long weekend, the 16th anniversary for my wife and I).&nbsp; After the kids went off to school, I drug out my bottling bucket, the full carboy, a racking cane, tubing and the bottle filler.<BR><BR>The beer had cleared beautifully.&nbsp; It was a little darker than I'd hoped, orange instead of gold.&nbsp; I'm guessing that's because I used aromatic grains instead of just pale malt.&nbsp; Still, it looked great and smelled even better.&nbsp; That Belgian character was present, no doubts.&nbsp; It was fruity, like banana and maybe something else.&nbsp; <BR><BR>I think I've finally mastered the siphoning thing.&nbsp; It went very smoothly, very quietly.&nbsp; Once I got it all in the bottling bucket I dropped in the hydrometer.&nbsp; It was 1012, this time.&nbsp; Yes, yes it was.&nbsp; I know that after a couple of weeks in the secondary it dropped a degree.&nbsp; It was clearly 1013 when I racked it to the carboy.&nbsp; It was clearly 1012 when I bottled. <BR><BR>Bottling went smoothly as well.&nbsp; It was a very pleasant morning.&nbsp; <BR><BR>Once they are ready to drink, maybe I can con the staff photographer into snapping a few pics to accompany the review.&nbsp; <BR></FONT></FONT>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Old Tasting Notes:  Red Nectar</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://blog.bottledllama.com/2008/04/29/old-tasting-notes--red-nectar-2.aspx" />
		<id>tag:blog.bottledllama.com,2008-04-30:07fb3d59-ded2-4408-aaf4-50a5d4ce88c9</id>
		<author>
			<name>Roger the Beerist</name>
		</author>
		<category term="Old Tasting Notes" />
		<category term="Beer review" />
		<category term="Amber" />
		<updated>2008-04-30T11:07:53Z</updated>
		<published>2008-04-30T11:00:00Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<P dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"><FONT face=Georgia size=3><IMG src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/100653-93340/Old_Tasting_Notes.jpg" width=480 border=0><BR><BR><BR>It is time for another beer from the Notes.&nbsp; For any who don't know about this series of blog entries, I stumbled upon an old file that contained tasting notes from approximately two and a half years ago, possibly even older than that.&nbsp; I decided to&nbsp;post these very sparse notes&nbsp;and I hope to eventually find these same beers again and evaluate them once more, just to see what differences are manifest.&nbsp; <BR><BR>This third beer of the Old Tasting Notes series is:<BR><BR><BR><IMG src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/100653-93340/red_nectar_label.jpg" width=100 border=0>&nbsp; Red Nectar, an amber ale from <A href="http://www.nectarales.com/nectar_brews.html">Nectar Ales</A>, now owned by <A href="http://www.firestonewalker.com/">Firestone Walker</A>.<BR><BR></FONT><FONT face=Georgia size=3><BR>Well, I apologize, I have very little extra info about this brewery.&nbsp; A slacker I am, obviously.&nbsp; Go surf the Firestone Walker website.&nbsp; They are reputable.<BR><BR>Thus and so, on to the notes.&nbsp; The scorecards used contained five categories:&nbsp; Color, Collar, Boquet, Mouthfeel, Taste, Overall.&nbsp; At the bottom of the card there is a space to score the beer from 1 to 5.&nbsp; They're very generic scoresheets and notes.<BR><BR></FONT></P>
<BLOCKQUOTE>COLOR -&nbsp;Red<BR><BR>COLLAR - Lingering<BR><BR>BOQUET -&nbsp;Pronounced hops<BR><BR>MOUTHFEEL - Astringent, full body<BR><BR>TASTE - Slightly bitter, great hops finish<BR><BR>OVERALL - Excellent - perfect balance of hops &amp; body - finish is beautiful<BR><BR>SCORE (1-5) - 5<BR><BR>COMMENTS - Spectacular color, superb balance - necessary for regular consumption</BLOCKQUOTE>
<P dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"><FONT face=Georgia size=3><BR>'Necessary for regular consumption' - well, isn't that ambiguous and open to interpretation.&nbsp; Either I want to drink this beer a lot or the 'superb balance' makes it drinkable.<BR><BR>Whatever.&nbsp; The next Old Taste will be a brown ale.&nbsp; Until then, have an old pint.&nbsp; Er, no, just have a pint.&nbsp; </FONT></P>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Another Pint: Trappistes Rochefort "8"</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://blog.bottledllama.com/2008/04/29/another-pint-trappistes-rochefort-8.aspx" />
		<id>tag:blog.bottledllama.com,2008-04-29:92157073-c581-47ea-8910-5297469e5151</id>
		<author>
			<name>Royal the Beerist</name>
		</author>
		<category term="Another Pint" />
		<category term="Belgian Ale" />
		<updated>2008-04-29T22:48:00Z</updated>
		<published>2008-04-29T22:38:00Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<P><IMG style="WIDTH: 202px; HEIGHT: 145px" height=91 src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/100653-93340/Another_Pint.jpg" width=700 border=0><BR><BR><FONT size=4>What is the point in being a “contributor” to a blog if you never contribute? It is a query akin to many such questions that plague my mentality on occasion: Shouldn’t people pass some kind of test before they are given a license to operate a motor vehicle? How can I be the staff photographer when there really is no staff to speak of and the photos I produce are at least as rare as Bigfoot? Are you a brewer if you don’t brew but have brewed? I don’t know. These questions are for the ponderers to ponder.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=4>I have at this particular juncture, however, managed to have another pint. It is an authentic Trappist product. It says so right on the label. This quaff is a Belgian Ale weighing in at 9.2%. More specifically, it is the Trappistes Rochefort 8, the Green Cap. In 2004 and 2006 this brew took home the Gold Medal from the World Beer Championships. To really get details about this fine import you might visit their website: </FONT><A href="http://www.trappistes-rochefort.com/"><FONT size=4>http://www.trappistes-rochefort.com/</FONT></A><FONT size=4>. I must warn you, if you are French impaired you will gain little from the visit. Since it originates with Trappists, I did a little web search. According to a well known internet source: A Trappist beer is a beer brewed by or under control of Trappist monks. … Only these seven breweries are authorized to label their beers with the Authentic Trappist Product logo that indicates a compliance to various rules edicted by the International Trappist Association. Right. I am not going to pretend to know anything further about the brewers of my pint. (Saying that, I have probably offended a great many readers and completely alienated those of you out there who really appreciate the art and craft of brewing. My apologies.)</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=4>The head was quite ferocious in its arrival. It was an off-white colour with many tiny spheres that dissipated leaving large orbs that collapsed into a film of foam upon the surface of the chocolately hued potation. Although a nice dark brown (very fitting for a Belgian-Style Dark Strong Ale), I swear I could see a tinge of fire red as the light pierced the glass directly. The bouquet did not hint at hops, but had a spicy note that I can’t quite pin down. My first down hit my palate like any good Belgian should, a nice tart mouth awakening pop that spoke of the alcohol it contained. Smooth. As it glided down the gullet the sweet malt flavor took up abiding about the tongue. Skitting between my teeth like a gnome flitting between trees was a fruity presence. There! Did I just get a bit of slight hop flavor? Maybe, maybe not. Give this beer a check mark in the “complex” column. It is spicy, sweet, smooth, medium bodied, mouth awakening, and yet all the while comfortable. </FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=4>I like it. It is that perfect end to a long day. I feel the heat in my ears. As I sit and try to describe the various qualities I realize that my glass is empty. So is the bottle. I do not regret spending $4.99 for these 11.2 fluid ounces one bit. I did not purchase the “6”. I am an idiot. Perhaps it will be there when I return. I don’t know what the monks do when they are not brewing, but I dare say they should spend less time doing it.<BR></FONT><BR><BR></P>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>The Weekly Pint:  Leffe</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://blog.bottledllama.com/2008/04/16/the-weekly-pint--leffe.aspx" />
		<id>tag:blog.bottledllama.com,2008-04-25:279cd8fc-fb67-4eac-b17b-8135051a7b84</id>
		<author>
			<name>Roger the Beerist</name>
		</author>
		<category term="Great Assortment" />
		<category term="Beer review" />
		<category term="Blond" />
		<category term="Weekly Pint" />
		<updated>2008-04-25T14:40:52Z</updated>
		<published>2008-04-25T14:40:00Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<FONT size=3><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: Georgia"><IMG style="WIDTH: 368px; HEIGHT: 217px" height=333 src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/100653-93340/TWP.jpg" width=700 border=0><BR><BR>This beer caused a near dilemma.&nbsp;&nbsp;Nothing about its style or taste or anything like that; no, it was the fact that I saw Anheusur-Busch was associated with it.&nbsp;&nbsp; I almost couldn't drink it (because I have a self-imposed boycott against A-B products).&nbsp; I was afraid they were doing some contract brewing.&nbsp; I was relieved when I realized they were simply the importer.&nbsp; That doesn't taint the beer.&nbsp; So, on to my pint for this week:&nbsp; Leffe, a blond Belgian.<BR><BR>The label says that Leffe is best enjoyed in its own specially designed, chalice shaped glass which helps preserve aroma and create perfect head.&nbsp; I do not have said glass so I grabbed the closest thing at hand - a margarita glass.&nbsp;&nbsp;Sacrilege you cry out!&nbsp; Well, call down the Beer Nazi Secret Gestapo Police Force or whatever; I am blatantly mixing Belgium and Mexico!&nbsp; Bite me.&nbsp; Let's see what happens.<BR><BR>I have an 11.2 ounce amber bottle wrapped with gold foil.&nbsp; I have opened it.&nbsp; The vapor of carbonation undulates around the opening like mystic smoke from an ancient cauldron .&nbsp; How inviting.&nbsp; It is now time.&nbsp; I shall pour - that's right, into the ... margarita glass.&nbsp; Beware.&nbsp; <BR><BR>It is done.<BR><BR>At first I'd swear it smells like Heineken.&nbsp; Nay, it is&nbsp;a subtle hint of hops - fruity hops.&nbsp;&nbsp;I think the margarita glass did an ample job of dispersing the harsh aroma of banana.&nbsp;&nbsp;It also provides a wide area for the&nbsp;thin collar of white to float&nbsp;atop a golden body.&nbsp; It's like a pond, a pond of Beglian delight.<BR><BR>And the taste ... oh, joy.&nbsp; The wonderful spiciness of a Belgian ale.&nbsp; I love it.&nbsp; I'm not certain how to explain&nbsp;the taste.&nbsp; It's a pepperiness embedded in the beer.&nbsp; It lingers for a time on the tongue.&nbsp; The finish is a spectre of the initial spicy taste.&nbsp;&nbsp; This&nbsp;Belgian blond&nbsp;ample body, thick and a little sweet - and don't we all love blonds with ample bodies (oh, I see, it's the 8% abv talking again - super).&nbsp; The hops&nbsp;balance&nbsp;the beer just right, I actually found that I appreciated their presence.<BR><BR>Fear not fellow Beerists, the ghost of Corona did not possess this fine abbey beer via the margarita glass.&nbsp;&nbsp;Leffe triumphed.&nbsp; Oh, and their&nbsp;<A href="http://www.leffe.com/">website</A> rocks!<BR><BR>Until the next pint ...</SPAN></FONT>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Homebrewing Update:  Clawed the First, a strong Belgian ale</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://blog.bottledllama.com/2008/04/19/homebrewing-update--clawed-the-first-a-strong-belgian-ale.aspx" />
		<id>tag:blog.bottledllama.com,2008-04-23:1c2c52ba-cdd7-4200-868c-d590ee6e552a</id>
		<author>
			<name>Roger the Beerist</name>
		</author>
		<category term="Strong Ale" />
		<category term="Homebrewing" />
		<updated>2008-04-23T08:35:09Z</updated>
		<published>2008-04-23T08:30:00Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<FONT size=3><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: Georgia">It's been too long since I've homebrewed.&nbsp; I think I did it once last year.&nbsp; So far this year:&nbsp; twice.&nbsp; Wow.&nbsp; Two whole times.&nbsp; I've forgotten how cool a hobby it really is.<BR><BR>On April 12&nbsp;the whole family brewed together.&nbsp; We did two batches of soda for the kids, root beer and&nbsp;cream soda.&nbsp; I wasn't sure what to expect but it turned out to be&nbsp;really simple.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <BR><BR>The soda extract came in&nbsp;small two ounce bottles.&nbsp; We combined the extract with about a gallon of water and eight cups of sugar (that's right, eight cups).&nbsp; We'd already made up a little "yeast starter" - a tablespoon of dry champagne yeast and a cup of hot water.&nbsp; That was added&nbsp;to the extract and sugar and&nbsp;topped&nbsp;off with another three gallons of water.&nbsp; After making sure it was mixed together well, we bottled.&nbsp;&nbsp;We ended up with 43&nbsp;bottles of cream soda and 44 bottles of root beer.&nbsp;&nbsp;The extract costs $5.95 for a bottle&nbsp;and the dry yeast is $1.25.&nbsp; Not bad for eighty bottles. <BR><BR>After the soda was done, Dad went on to make his beer.&nbsp; It's the First Edition of Clawed, the Strong Belgian of Bottled Llama Brewing.&nbsp; I did a partial mash, which I've not done in years.&nbsp; I think it went pretty well.&nbsp; I made good use of a strainer and grain bag.&nbsp;&nbsp;I shoved the strainer into the top of my kettle, lined it with the grain bag and recirculated my mash water through it a couple of times then sparged with hot water.&nbsp; It looked and smelled wonderful.&nbsp; <BR><BR>The whole day went very well.&nbsp; I even remembered to write down everything I did - temperatures, times, ingredients and amounts.&nbsp;&nbsp;I can actually duplicate&nbsp;this beer&nbsp;later.&nbsp; I even&nbsp;made a 1000ml yeast starter.&nbsp; Fermentation started in under twelve hours and it was very active -&nbsp;stuff was blowing out the airlock for two days.&nbsp;&nbsp;Original gravity was 1060.&nbsp; I was hoping for a little higher, actually, and for a Belgian strong ale it should be (the ranges I saw were from 1064 to 1075).&nbsp; I'm guessing my mash wasn't perfect. <BR><BR>I racked to the secondary on April 19.&nbsp; The gravity was 1013.&nbsp; I figured the alcohol content (by volume) should be around 6.2%.&nbsp; I'm hoping that racking the beer may&nbsp;kickstart the yeast a little and it will ferment out a little more.&nbsp;<BR><BR> The beer is a murky orange right now.&nbsp; It looks like five gallons of unfiltered, raw honey.&nbsp; It smells spectacular.&nbsp; The alcohol is evident and the fruitiness of the Belgian yeast is really outstanding.&nbsp; Can't wait to try it.&nbsp; It'll be one of the Weekly Pint's, no doubt.</SPAN></FONT>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>The Weekly Pint:  Korbinian from Weihenstephaner -- UPDATED</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://blog.bottledllama.com/2008/04/06/the-weekly-pint--korbinian-from-weihenstephaner.aspx" />
		<id>tag:blog.bottledllama.com,2008-04-21:1bf9bf60-c997-4488-a6d1-525fd48208af</id>
		<author>
			<name>Roger the Beerist</name>
		</author>
		<category term="Doppelbock" />
		<category term="Weekly Pint" />
		<category term="Beer review" />
		<category term="Great Assortment" />
		<updated>2008-04-21T14:42:54Z</updated>
		<published>2008-04-21T14:00:00Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<P><IMG style="WIDTH: 393px; HEIGHT: 295px" src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/100653-93340/TWP.jpg" border=0><BR><BR><FONT size=3><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: Georgia">This another beer that makes me feel so very cosmopolitan, so recherche;&nbsp;like James Bond of the beer world.&nbsp; Just imagine:&nbsp; you walk into a sweet pub, all decked out, full of pomp and circumstance and you say to the bartender:&nbsp; "I'm a beerist, {insert name here} the Beerist.&nbsp; I'll take a Korbinian - draft not bottled."&nbsp; The bartender looks at you and says, "What?&nbsp; Are you on crack?"&nbsp; You smile glibly and say,&nbsp; "No."<BR><BR>Well, let's get on to serious matters.&nbsp;&nbsp;The folks at the <A href="http://www.weihenstephaner.de/index.php?page=home_2_1&amp;">Weihenstaphener brewery</A>&nbsp;were kind enough to provide some background info on their spectacular doppelbock.&nbsp; The beer is named after Saint Corbinian.&nbsp; He was sent to Bavaria to evangelize and&nbsp;established a Benedictine monastery on Nahrberg Hill near the city of Freising in 725 AD.&nbsp;&nbsp;Apparently, Corbinian was the one converted, for now the Weihenstaphener Brewery&nbsp;sits atop that hill and continues to produce superb beer.&nbsp;<BR><BR>This beer is a bock, so it's stylistically appropriate for the namesake to be a monk, eh,&nbsp;even if his name doesn't end in <EM>-ator</EM>.&nbsp; Ironically, Korbinian is also the name of a neurologist from the nineteenth century - and this doppelbock can affect the brain, that's for sure.<BR><BR>The label is laden with imagery and symbolism as well.&nbsp; The brewery sent me an explanation of the images.&nbsp; Instead of mangling it all in the retelling, I'll quote their words:</FONT></P>
<BLOCKQUOTE>"Corbinian's symbol is the saddled bear. According to his hagiography, a bear killed Corbinian's pack horse on the way to Rome and so the saint commanded it to carry his load. Once he arrived in Rome, however, he let the bear go, and it lumbered back to its native forest. Both the heraldic element and the legend itself carry significant symbolism. One interpretation is that the bear tamed by God's grace is the Bishop of Freising himself and the pack saddle is the burden of his episcopate. The bear's submission and retreat can also be interpreted as Christianity's "taming" and "domestication" of the ferocity of paganism and, consequentially, the laying of a "foundation for a great civilization in the Duchy of Bavaria."<BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<P><FONT size=3>Korbinian&nbsp;is a "dunkles starkbier," or, dark strong beer.&nbsp; Living up to its name, it pours very dark - a brownish red, like&nbsp;beautiful cherry wood.&nbsp; It's got a thick, smooth, yellow-white head that came apart as I drank, bits of it&nbsp;floating here and there across the vast expanse of the body.&nbsp; It was like globs of fungus floating on a dark pool.&nbsp; Or maybe the continents as Pangea split.&nbsp;&nbsp;<BR><BR>My favorite quality of the double bock was its aroma.&nbsp; It smelled like a muffin; a bready, alcohol&nbsp;drenched muffin.&nbsp; Yes, it's&nbsp;like a&nbsp;perfect pastry in a bottle.&nbsp; Anyone for breakfast?&nbsp;&nbsp; Hmm ... make some <A href="http://allrecipes.com/recipe/beer-pancakes/detail.aspx">beer pancakes</A>&nbsp;and drench them with a syrupy scotch ale and accompany that with Korbinian.&nbsp; Screw the 'breakfast of champions,' that's the 'breakfast of brewers.'<BR><BR>As far as flavor, it's&nbsp;oily sweet with a brief touch of carbonation.&nbsp; It evaporates from the back of the tongue, leaving a crisp finish.&nbsp; No hops were evident so&nbsp;I loved it even more.&nbsp; It's a heavy beer, made for after dinner (if you decide against breakfast, that is).&nbsp; It's very rich.&nbsp;&nbsp;<BR><BR>Many thanks go out to Nicole Rupprecht from Weihenstephaner.&nbsp; I&nbsp;was terribly excited to find&nbsp;her response to my email waiting in my inbox Monday morning and I'm glad to know a little more about the&nbsp;'world's&nbsp;oldest brewery.'&nbsp; I look forward to trying more of their beers.&nbsp;<BR><BR>Until the next pint ....</SPAN></FONT></P>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Old Tasting Notes:  Red Seal Ale</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://blog.bottledllama.com/2008/04/16/old-tasting-notes--red-seal-ale.aspx" />
		<id>tag:blog.bottledllama.com,2008-04-16:a76bcc37-d5d5-49f2-a38f-1f3589c50bfd</id>
		<author>
			<name>Roger the Beerist</name>
		</author>
		<category term="Beer review" />
		<category term="Old Tasting Notes" />
		<category term="Pale Ale" />
		<updated>2008-04-30T11:23:24Z</updated>
		<published>2008-04-16T10:46:00Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<P dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"><FONT face=Georgia size=3><IMG src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/100653-93340/Old_Tasting_Notes.jpg" width=480 border=0><BR><BR><BR>It is time for another beer from the Notes.&nbsp; For any who don't know about this series of blog entries, I stumbled upon an old file that contained tasting notes from approximately two and a half years ago, possibly even older than that.&nbsp; I decided to&nbsp;post these very sparse notes&nbsp;and I hope to eventually find these same beers again and evaluate them once more, just to see what differences are manifest.&nbsp; <BR><BR>This third beer of the Old Tasting Notes series is:<BR><BR><BR><IMG src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/100653-93340/brand_RedSeal_pour.jpg" width=160 border=0>&nbsp; Red Seal Ale, a pale ale from <A href="http://www.northcoastbrewing.com/home.htm">North Coast Brewing</A>.&nbsp; <BR><BR></FONT><FONT face=Georgia size=3><BR>Apparently, North Coast has been around since 1988.&nbsp; No one informed me.&nbsp; After poking around on their website, I think I may have had some of their beers other than Red Seal, but I'm not sure.&nbsp; I know I've heard of them.&nbsp; Old Rasputin and Brother Thelonius.&nbsp; They also have some Acme Ales which I desire to consume.&nbsp; I automatically thought of the Coyote and Roadrunner cartoons.&nbsp; With such good beer names and a good reputation ("worth seeking out" according to MJ and lots of awards) I definitely want more.<BR><BR>Thus and so, on to the notes.&nbsp; The scorecards used contained five categories:&nbsp; Color, Collar, Boquet, Mouthfeel, Taste, Overall.&nbsp; At the bottom of the card there is a space to score the beer from 1 to 5.&nbsp; They're very generic scoresheets and notes.<BR><BR></FONT></P>
<BLOCKQUOTE>COLOR -&nbsp;Orange - kind of cloudy<BR><BR>COLLAR - Clung well to the glass - good mix of bubbles<BR><BR>BOQUET - Strong hops<BR><BR>MOUTHFEEL - Sticky, kind of oily<BR><BR>TASTE - Unexpected tang, excellent hop finish<BR><BR>OVERALL - Very nice, decently balanced, not overpowering<BR><BR>SCORE (1-5) - 4<BR><BR>COMMENTS - Fermentation not perfect - too orange for a red, decent for style - too cloudy - yeast bite<BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<P dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"><FONT face=Georgia size=3><BR>I sound stupid with those ratings.&nbsp; 'Good mix of bubbles?'&nbsp; Who says that?&nbsp; Would you go to your bartender and say, "Yo, I wanna beer with a good mix of bubbles?"&nbsp; No.&nbsp; Stupid.&nbsp; My favorite dumb comment is "too orange for a red."&nbsp; Obviously I simply read the name and <EM>ass</EM>umed this was a red ale.&nbsp; I did not do my homework and realize it's a pale ale.&nbsp;&nbsp; 'Fermentation not perfect.'&nbsp; What in the name of brewing does that mean?&nbsp; I embarass myself with these stupid rantings.<BR><BR>Whatever.&nbsp; The next Old Taste will be an American amber ale.&nbsp; Until then, have an old pint.&nbsp; Er, no, just have a pint.&nbsp; </FONT></P>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>The Weekly Pint:  Breckenridge Vanilla Porter</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://blog.bottledllama.com/2008/04/06/the-weekly-pint--breckenridge-vanilla-porter.aspx" />
		<id>tag:blog.bottledllama.com,2008-04-11:535fc34d-ea45-4025-9551-17734ff7ae54</id>
		<author>
			<name>Roger the Beerist</name>
		</author>
		<category term="Great Assortment" />
		<category term="Porter" />
		<category term="Beer review" />
		<category term="Weekly Pint" />
		<updated>2008-04-11T08:44:04Z</updated>
		<published>2008-04-11T08:45:00Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<IMG style="WIDTH: 307px; HEIGHT: 265px" src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/100653-93340/TWP.jpg" border=0><BR><BR><FONT size=3><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: Georgia">"The problems of two people may not amount to a hill of beans," said Frank Drebin (masterfully portrayed by Leslie Nielsen in <EM>The Naked Gun</EM>).&nbsp; "But this is our hill and these are our beans."&nbsp;&nbsp;<BR><BR>That movie was hilarious.&nbsp; You're probably wondering what it has to do with beer.&nbsp; Not much, really, I just thought it was funny.&nbsp; I guess the only real link between that quote and&nbsp;this week's pint is the bean reference.&nbsp; I drank the third bottle from the <A href="http://blog.bottledllama.com/2008/03/18/the-weekly-pint--sierra-nevadas-big-foot.aspx">Great Assortment</A>, a six pack of assorted beers purchased in Tempe, AZ after the Great Arizona Beer Festival.&nbsp; It's a vanilla porter and <A href="http://breckbrew.com/">Breckenridge Brewery</A>&nbsp;uses vanilla <EM>beans,</EM> directly from Papua New Guinea and Madagascar, in the brewing process.&nbsp; See the connection now?&nbsp; Whatever.<BR><BR>I noticed&nbsp;it at the Arizona Beer Fest and made sure to make my wife try it.&nbsp; She liked it, just as I knew she would.&nbsp; It's a sweet piece of beer candy.&nbsp; I found out it's better in three ounces than twelve, though.&nbsp; <BR><BR>It had a refined, blossoming, dirty ivory head which fell rather fast, leaving a&nbsp;thin bead&nbsp;atop&nbsp;a brown and red body.&nbsp; The aroma was fabulous, beginning with a tinny fruit smell, progressing to&nbsp;harsh roasted grain.&nbsp; Then the vanilla&nbsp;blankets both, melding and blending them together.&nbsp; No hops were evident -&nbsp;even though&nbsp;they use four different hops:&nbsp; Chinook, Tettnang, Perle and Goulding - and as you all know that suits me well.&nbsp; <BR><BR>It was tingly right at the tip of the tongue and that tickle of carbonation was just enough.&nbsp; The body was incredibly slick with the vanilla weaving itself everywhere.&nbsp;&nbsp;It's just amazingly sweet.&nbsp; In fact, I'd say the&nbsp;vanilla clogs up the body.&nbsp; Yet, it&nbsp;doesn't seem out of place.&nbsp; I know, that sounds contradictory; but the vanilla <EM>belongs</EM> in this beer.&nbsp; It finishes dry even though it's a sticky and thick beer.&nbsp; Overall, it was sweet and creamy.&nbsp; It was&nbsp;like a root beer float with extra ice cream and some whipped cream.&nbsp; Oh, and some vanilla extract poured on top.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<BR><BR>I found it hard to drink, which is something I never thought I'd say about a beer, but it really is a good beer.&nbsp;&nbsp;Craft beer drinkers, or beerists as I now refer to people in the craft beer world,&nbsp;will certainly enjoy the beer.&nbsp; It's a fantastic extrapolation on a classic beer&nbsp;style.&nbsp;&nbsp;I don't think it's a cross-over beer.&nbsp;&nbsp;Sure, it would expose an average beer drinker to a powerful taste but it might just be too much.<BR><BR>Until the next pint ...&nbsp;&nbsp; </SPAN></FONT>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Old Tasting Notes:  Mandarin Hefeweizen</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://blog.bottledllama.com/2008/04/08/old-tasting-notes--mandarin-hefeweizen.aspx" />
		<id>tag:blog.bottledllama.com,2008-04-08:a3c34bb7-83d9-4829-9126-f1a966c3e3bb</id>
		<author>
			<name>Roger the Beerist</name>
		</author>
		<category term="Old Tasting Notes" />
		<category term="Beer review" />
		<category term="Hefeweizen" />
		<updated>2008-04-30T11:24:15Z</updated>
		<published>2008-04-08T14:23:00Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<P dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"><FONT face=Georgia size=3>I stumbled upon an old file that contained tasting notes from approximately two and a half years ago, possibly even older than that.&nbsp; I'll post these very sparse notes on the blog.&nbsp; I hope to eventually find these same beers again and evaluate them once more, just to see what differences are manifest.&nbsp; <BR><BR>The&nbsp;second beer of the Old Tasting Notes series is:<BR><BR><IMG src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/100653-93340/2361906350.jpg" width=51 border=0>&nbsp;Grant's Mandarin Hefeweizen.<BR><BR>Apparently, Bert Grant used to brew this at Yakima Brewing.&nbsp; Here is what Michael Jackson (no, the Beer Hunter) had to say about him:&nbsp; <BR><BR></P></FONT>
<BLOCKQUOTE><A href="http://www.beerhunter.com/documents/19133-001575.html">He brought classic styles back to life, but gave each beer its own personality. He created beers that he liked, and hoped that they would find drinkers who felt the same way. The world needs people like Bert Grant. It needs egos who can deliver: whether they are brewers, bakers, cheese-makers, charcutiers, chefs, restaurateurs, entertainers, movie-directors, writers... people who know what they like and how to produce it, without reference to jargon-bound bores in suits.</A></BLOCKQUOTE><FONT face=Georgia size=3>
<P dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">Mr. Grant established the first post-Prohibition pub in the US; from the few articles I've read about him, he seemed to be quite a character.&nbsp; His brewery&nbsp;has&nbsp;closed and this beer has been retired.&nbsp; All I've got is the memory and some cheesy notes.&nbsp; Here they are.<BR><BR>The scorecards used contained five categories:&nbsp; Color, Collar, Boquet, Mouthfeel, Taste, Overall.&nbsp; At the bottom of the card there is a space to score the beer from 1 to 5.&nbsp; They're very generic scoresheets and notes.<BR><BR></FONT></P>
<BLOCKQUOTE>COLOR - Perfect cloudy&nbsp; yellow<BR><BR>COLLAR - White - tiny bubbles - goes quick, hung around edges<BR><BR>BOQUET - Excellent citrus and hops<BR><BR>MOUTHFEEL - Very smooth, thin, light<BR><BR>TASTE - Citrus-hops battle - excellent<BR><BR>OVERALL - Excellent - great citrus overtones<BR><BR>SCORE (1-5) - 5<BR><BR>COMMENTS - Excellent!&nbsp; Balanced, tangy - could drink all day<BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<P dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"><FONT face=Georgia size=3><BR><BR>Well, isn't that just informative.&nbsp; It would seem I thought this beer was 'excellent.'&nbsp; Alas, I shalt nevermore be able to taste it again and compare.&nbsp; It has been laid to rest with its maker.&nbsp; <BR><BR>So be it.&nbsp; The next Old Taste will be a pale ale, one with quite a reputation it seems.&nbsp; Until then, have an old pint.&nbsp; Er, no, just have a pint.&nbsp; </FONT></P>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Another Pint: St. Peter's English Ale</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://blog.bottledllama.com/2008/04/06/another-pint--st-peters-english-ale.aspx" />
		<id>tag:blog.bottledllama.com,2008-04-06:4c5c6925-7c2c-4334-b17a-9fa53ddc23e9</id>
		<author>
			<name>Royal the Beerist</name>
		</author>
		<category term="Pale Ale" />
		<category term="Weekly Pint" />
		<updated>2008-04-06T21:19:16Z</updated>
		<published>2008-04-06T21:15:00Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[&nbsp; 
<P style="MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0in">The unwritten unspoken ban on all writing not originating with Roger has been lifted! Was there such a ban? Was the Bottled Llama Brewing blog literarily locked down by the head author? Was the maniac responsible for all of the posts thus far single handedly preventing any and all content not typed by his fingers? The world may never know. However, at this point, I have undertaken a task to add content to our blog. Hopefully, it will be a good addition and not the type of thing that causes readers to vomit and gouge their eyes out with rusty spoons. That being said, here goes...</P>
<P style="MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0in"><BR></P>
<P style="MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0in">The thing that drew me to this brew was the unique bottle. Isn't that judging a book by it's cover? Probably so, yes. But, you have to look at the cover if you want to read the book. Sometimes the title doesn't really do anything to make you choose it, but if it has a cover that perhaps draws you into the possibilities of the storyline... So, I saw the flask shaped bottle and thought, “Hmm, what is this?” “This” happened to be St. Peter's English Ale. The label is simple and unassuming; a light green oval bordered with a gold band. It claims to use organically grown hops and barley and have Soil Association Organic Certification UK5. Evidently, the bottle is a replica of a bottle used in the New England area circa 1770.</P>
<P style="MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0in"><BR></P>
<P style="MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0in">St. Peter's Brewery Company Limited, United Kingdom creates it's brews in a medieval hall in a remote rural corner of Suffolk, England. Well, I liked the cover and the summary on the back puts it soundly in my genre of choice. I won't copy the description from the website, I'll just give you the link: <A href="http://www.eurobrews.com/stpeters/organicea.html">http://www.eurobrews.com/stpeters/organicea.html</A>.</P>
<P style="MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0in"><BR></P>
<P style="MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0in">The aroma of hops seemed to fade quickly as did the thin head. It is a light golden color and quite clear. The presence of hops is noticed throughout with a small bite of bitterness as it rolls down the throat. Floral notes float gently through the nostrils as clean crisp liquid passes the edge of the glass. It would seem that I fairly accurately tasted what the website says I was supposed to taste. Well, score one for me! Examining the style guides, I would place this particular beer in the Classic English Style Pale Ale category. Although this is not really my favorite style, this beer is an excellent example. Of course with most hoppy brews, as this one warms a bit the bitterness becomes more pronounced. Would I recommend this beer? Yes. If you are a hop loving, pale ale sucking, bitter lover then you will like this brew. Will I regularly seek it out and become a regular devotee? Not likely. When in the mood, however, I would purchase this English Ale and like it.</P>
<P style="MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0in"><BR></P>
<P style="MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0in">That's it. That's the first of hopefully more beer reviews by me, Royal, the other half of Bottled Llama Brewing.</P>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>The Weekly Pint and The Session:  Beer People and Mesquito Brewing's Pilsner</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://blog.bottledllama.com/2008/03/21/the-session--beer-people.aspx" />
		<id>tag:blog.bottledllama.com,2008-04-04:bb7dae54-26c7-451c-8d9e-93b15df1a168</id>
		<author>
			<name>Roger the Beerist</name>
		</author>
		<category term="The Session" />
		<category term="Pilsner" />
		<category term="Beer review" />
		<category term="Weekly Pint" />
		<updated>2008-04-04T08:00:07Z</updated>
		<published>2008-04-04T08:00:00Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<IMG src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/100653-93340/00_thesession150.jpg" width=150 border=0><BR><BR><BR><FONT face=Georgia size=3>The Session is a monthly melee of beer writing.&nbsp; Writers from all over blog about a certain theme on the first Friday of each month.&nbsp; The theme for this month was selected by </FONT><A href="http://stonch.blogspot.com/"><FONT face=Georgia size=3>Stonch</FONT></A><FONT face=Georgia size=3>, April's host.&nbsp; He wanted us to write about people.&nbsp; Super.&nbsp; I took up drinking and writing to avoid the bipedal anthropoids that inhabit this planet with me; now I'm being forced to spew out reasons why I like some&nbsp;of them and what that has to do with beer.&nbsp; Spiffy.&nbsp;&nbsp;On with it, then.&nbsp; <BR><BR>I picked&nbsp;my beer swilling pals&nbsp;Royal and Erick to write about.&nbsp; Royal&nbsp;is the other half of Bottled Llama Brewing.&nbsp; He and I have been friends for as long as I can remember.&nbsp; He didn't always like beer.&nbsp; But it didn't take much to convert him:&nbsp; a little peer pressure and a night of 'evaluating' real beer.&nbsp; Afterwards, Royal understood that there was much more to beer than the standard American lager.&nbsp; He began to appreciate stouts, especially.&nbsp; Erick, on the other hand, was a lush long before I knew him.&nbsp; He liked Budweiser (a subject we shan't discuss here) and Sam Adams.&nbsp; All the other people&nbsp;he and I knew didn't understand beer; thus, we took to hanging out together since we could relax as we drank our lagers.<BR><BR>It was only a matter of time before we hit on the idea of homebrewing.&nbsp; The three of us had a dinner one night&nbsp;and decided to start the hobby.&nbsp; We spent long hours brainstorming (our wives, to this day,&nbsp;call it 'drinking and blabbing', but I swear to you it was brainstorming!) and eventually we came up with the kind of beers we'd try to make and a name:&nbsp; Mesquito Brewing.&nbsp; Two weeks later, when I finally got 'round to ordering the materials, we could remember our "brewery" name, we'd forgotten the beers, ordered the kit and brewed&nbsp;the pilsner that came with the kit.<BR><BR>Roles appeared quickly after that.&nbsp; Royal was the technical guy or mechanical guy or however you want to put it.&nbsp; He liked the burners and wort chillers and&nbsp;pumps and&nbsp;dry ice and all that jazz.&nbsp; He took to reading up on homebrew do-it-yourself projects.&nbsp; After a little prompting, he even looked up&nbsp;how to make a still.&nbsp; Alas, while he is proficient in understanding and visualizing these dandy projects and improvements he lacks the time&nbsp;to actually build them.&nbsp; At least I know that he could do it, though.&nbsp; Gambrinus knows I can't!<BR><BR>Erick is an electrician and he's just as technically competent as Royal, if not more.&nbsp; The two of them could figure out anything.&nbsp; For our purposes, though, Erick was really the ... Head of the "Research" Department.&nbsp; As&nbsp;Royal built things in his mind, Erick was trying beers.&nbsp; He always brought a good twelver of Sam Adams or something decent to brew sessions.&nbsp; I&nbsp;think&nbsp;he liked the idea of brewing, to be sure,&nbsp;but he was more interested in just hanging out and tossing back a couple of beers.&nbsp; Now that I think about it, maybe he understood what beer is really all about.&nbsp; During the boil, he and I would drink and talk and Royal would peruse catalogs.&nbsp; It was all great fun.&nbsp;&nbsp;<BR><BR>We really applied Papazian's mantra "Relax, don't worry" during that first homebrew session.&nbsp; (We couldn't apply the rest of the chant, "have a homebrew" because, well, it was our first time and, you know, we didn't have any homebrew).&nbsp;&nbsp;We bottled a week or so later;&nbsp;two or three weeks later we drank our pilsner, a gorgeous lager created by our own hands.&nbsp; The beer was superb.&nbsp; At least, from what I can remember.&nbsp; It tasted clean; it had more body than any of the Budweiser's we'd ever drank.&nbsp; It was a deep yellow, with a fairly thin head.&nbsp; It was the smoothest beer I'd ever had.&nbsp; <BR><BR>We tried brewing it again but it didn't work out so well the&nbsp;second time.&nbsp; We moved on to other beers.&nbsp; We made a stout, during which we nearly burned down my house and managed to get wort all over my kitchen.&nbsp; We did a barleywine, which is still one of my favorite brews.&nbsp; There were others, too, but I remember the pilsner the most.&nbsp; <BR><BR>During this same time the three of us were in a band together.&nbsp; So, we'd brew, we'd jam, we'd have a few beers.&nbsp; Weekends rocked.&nbsp;&nbsp;But "nothing lasts forever" as Guns N Roses sang.&nbsp;&nbsp;The band broke up, the brewing slowed down, life took over.&nbsp; But, at least "the memory remains." (If I gotta tell you who sang that, well, I'm very disappointed).<BR><BR>However, my kids like brewing.&nbsp; We've done a few batches together and that's been a lot of fun.&nbsp; My wife deals with the smells and mess of brew day quite well; she even goes to beer festivals with me.&nbsp; Thus, brewing continues, just not at the same pace.<BR><BR>Now that I've written this I can't help but think of the Blues Brothers.&nbsp;&nbsp;Perhaps the Session is some kind of cathedral of beer&nbsp;and this entry is&nbsp;a ray of light spearing me from on high.&nbsp;&nbsp;Maybe&nbsp;it's time to "put the band back together."</FONT>]]></content>
	</entry>
</feed>